Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Coke Bust

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Davewild (talk) 06:46, 20 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Coke Bust (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

NN band failing WP:BAND and GNG. The only thing that comes close is BAND#5, but that requires two or more articles on one of the more important indie labels. Six Weeks Records is barely notable themselves, and the band only has one album.

The only other sources I can find are an obscure blog interview and a few mentions on sites like http://www.marylanddeathfest.com

Article failed CSD because reviewing admin saw an assertion of importance in the authors claiming that they are either notable for being so amateur (DIY) or having traveled. The Dissident Aggressor 17:11, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. lavender|^{(formerly HMSSolent)}|lambast 01:22, 29 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Washington, D.C.-related deletion discussions. lavender|^{(formerly HMSSolent)}|lambast 01:22, 29 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - My searches (News, Books, browser, highbeam and thefreelibrary) found nothing to suggest good coverage even in the least aside from various links; I would've said draft/userfy but I doubt anyone would want this as there hasn't been any improvement since April 2012 (and, frankly, I'm not seeing any anytime soon). SwisterTwister talk 17:48, 1 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete The main notability I see is that they have had 2 LPs, 3 LPs, a couple of singles, and released records with seven different labels. I would think that if they were at all successful, a label would try to keep them around for more than one release. They lack WP:GNG and fail WP:BAND. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:35, 18 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.