Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Collin DeLome (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Wizardman 14:48, 13 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Collin DeLome

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Perpetual minor league baseball player, I don't see passing WP:Athlete or the baseball notability guidelines (previous AfD mentions an all-star game appearance meeting them, but I don't see it there now.) References are routine sports coverage. kelapstick^(bainuu)21:49, 6 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Baseball-related deletion discussions. kelapstick^(bainuu)22:14, 6 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - The CBS Sports reference in the article about him being named Conference player and hitter of the year is hardly "routine sports coverage." Most players do not achieve this and the article goes into some detail about this player. Although if that is the only significant coverage I agree it is not enough to pass WP:N. Rlendog (talk) 13:31, 7 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - in my book, the awards from the Southland Conference don't even come close to rising to the level of conferring notability. Since there doesn't appear to be other evidence to support keeping this article, delete it. Northern Antarctica ₵ 16:35, 7 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I concur with my distinguished colleague from Northern Antartica. Spanneraol (talk) 17:16, 7 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Not notable.--Yankees10 17:48, 7 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:14, 8 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:14, 8 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.