Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Comodo

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) DavidLeighEllis (talk) 19:32, 17 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Comodo (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Disambiguation page has only two items but only leads to an actual article, Comodo Group. Now, Comodo Group has produced a lot of products that have article on Wikipedia, but they are not allowed in there, per WP:PTM. I don't think anyone would miss it if we deleted it and, if community insists, switch to hatnote-based disambiguation. Codename Lisa (talk) 07:26, 11 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep: the link to the likely misspelling Komodo is useful and can't easily be accommodated in a hatnote. I've tidied the dab page and added an "in title" link. PamD 14:05, 11 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Disambiguations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:42, 11 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep useful disambiguation page. Candleabracadabra (talk) 11:51, 12 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep one link to an article, one entry which meets MOS:DABMENTION and a very ambiguous see also. Boleyn (talk) 13:08, 14 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.