Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Comparison of Canadian-tax preparation software for personal use

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 18:35, 24 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comparison of Canadian-tax preparation software for personal use

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Yet another indiscriminate collection of external links with no apparently notable programs and even if so, this should link to their articles and not to their website. WP:NOTDIRECTORY and borderline G11. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 15:05, 17 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Finance-related deletion discussions. The Mighty Glen (talk) 15:25, 17 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. The Mighty Glen (talk) 15:25, 17 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. The Mighty Glen (talk) 15:25, 17 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. The Mighty Glen (talk) 15:25, 17 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Strong delete. WP:NOT on so many levels (linkfarm, directory, guide) Ajf773 (talk) 18:36, 17 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
DeleteAll but 3 would be redlinks, and it is a sort of essay, not an article, and not proven to noteworthy.^{cinco de}L3X1 ◊distænt write◊ 03:06, 18 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.