Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Compassionate Mind Foundation

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete housekeeping non-admin closure: 16:27, 23 November 2014 Amatulic (talk | contribs) deleted page Compassionate Mind Foundation (G12: Unambiguous copyright infringement: Also WP:CSD#A7: not notable) czar ♔ 16:37, 23 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Compassionate Mind Foundation

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article created by WP:SPA, with primary function of WP:ADVERT and WP:PROMO. Also WP:COPYVIO. — Cirt (talk) 06:21, 28 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. — Cirt (talk) 06:23, 28 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 14:07, 28 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Behavioural science-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 14:08, 28 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Strong Merge - this is a "charitable arm" of the creator of this therapy, intended to bring the therapy to the broader market. It is notable as far as Paul Gilbert (psychologist) pushes it and should be merged under his article or, arguably, under the therapy itself.EBY (talk) 15:57, 28 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, j⚛e decker ^talk 00:28, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:45, 13 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, and Redirect to the page for Gilbert. It may possibly become more significant, but so far its activity has been limited to runing workshops and an annual conference. The existing article is too promotional to be worth saving DGG ( talk ) 01:20, 16 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and merge to Paul Gilbert (psychologist). It is not notable in itself, and the entire information, taking only the most significant ones, can be trimmed down to 2-3 sentences. Chhandama (talk) 03:35, 23 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete as being entirely copyvio (G12) and with no claim of significance (A7). Recreate as a potentially useful redirect to the main source cited in the article, Gilbert. czar ♔ 16:11, 23 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.