Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Computer Generated Solutions, Inc.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:55, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Computer Generated Solutions, Inc. (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

All of the sources are Press release and primary sources. The company is non notable. Possible COI. Mar11 (talk) 11:54, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Mar11 (talk) 15:11, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Mar11 (talk) 15:11, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Mar11 (talk) 15:11, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. Mar11 (talk) 15:11, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as corporate spam / office directory. One would think that a 7,000+ employee company could be notable, but I could not find any sources that were not PR. K.e.coffman (talk) 03:16, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per WP:TOOSOON and WP:MILL. Thus is too new, in an industry rampant with new outfits who call themselves call centers. Bearian (talk) 22:00, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.