Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Concepción Chile Temple

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:42, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Concepción Chile Temple

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet WP:GNG. Available sources are primary ones from the Deseret News, which is owned by the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints (more info.), primary sources in other publications, and press releases. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 11:20, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 11:21, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 11:21, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Chile-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 11:21, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - why single out this one when there are 150+ standalone articles for LDS temples? There's also precedent for keeping these kinds of articles, see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Montréal Québec Temple or Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Portland Oregon Temple for examples. Shereth 18:26, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep especially at the time of dedication temples get significant coverage from the news media, even news media quite some distance from the temple. Beyond this, the attempts to void use of Deseret News coverage as an acceptable source would have the effect of excluding several Mormon related articles from Wikipedia. A consideration of the level of coverage that the Rome Italy Temple and Philadelphia Pennsylvania Temple have gotten shows that temples are inherently notable.John Pack Lambert (talk) 00:06, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. It's a major endeavor, creating a temple in a country where there are 600,000 LDS members. Deseret News coverage is valid, and it is reasonable to think there is coverage in Chile. This is one Spanish-language source, biobiochile (a newspaper?) mentioning it, perhaps helpful for figuring out how to search for coverage in Spanish. Try "Chile mormon templo" without quotes, for example. --doncram 07:13, 30 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- And this news story seems to describe archeological issues at the site? and gives a pic of the building under construction. It is the secondo templo in the pais, after one in Santiago i think. --do ncr am 07:21, 30 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per above.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 21:37, 30 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- as significant project, and the notability would only increase with the opening and subsequent use. I don't see a reason to delete this article. K.e.coffman (talk) 03:20, 31 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.