Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Concept 21

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Consensus that there is sufficient sourcing, with WP:ARTIST specifically met Nosebagbear (talk) 09:03, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Concept 21 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable topic, created by COI editor who has been editing around the topic. Lacks WP:RS, fails WP:GNG. Meeanaya (talk) 05:10, 15 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Arts-related deletion discussions. Meeanaya (talk) 05:10, 15 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. Goldsztajn (talk) 11:18, 15 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep, the page seems adequately sourced. Randy Kryn (talk) 11:51, 15 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep either the first performance art group or part of the first wave of performance artists (pp.51-2) in China - meets WP:ARTIST notability #3 and #4. Google books search returns numerous WP:RS .... WP:BEFORE? --Goldsztajn (talk) 13:30, 15 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 11:08, 16 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep, Per the above, meets WP:ARTIST notability . --SalmanZ (talk) 20:00, 17 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.