Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Conservancy Association

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 18:09, 1 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Conservancy Association (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Nominated by an unregistered user. Their rationale, taken from Talk:Conservancy Association, is as follows:

This article has no references to reliable sources. Delete it.2001:A61:3222:6201:D99:5CAD:E6:3AEA (talk) 02:07, 25 May 2017 (UTC) clpo13(talk) 18:37, 26 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. clpo13(talk) 18:45, 26 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hong Kong-related deletion discussions. clpo13(talk) 18:45, 26 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Uses material from the Wikipedia article Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Conservancy Association, released under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license.