Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Constantine Sandis

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Mark Arsten (talk) 01:32, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Constantine Sandis

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No evidence of notability WP:GNG and WP:PROF. Sources fail WP:RS. PROD was removed. Ad Orientem (talk) 18:37, 7 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Northamerica1000^(talk) 15:23, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Sandis apparently is the one listed editor of a book series, and is author of what looks like a pretty big book/textbook that appears to affect the field and/or to reach outside the narrow area of the field. Here is an Amazon link. How can one get book sales information? I am not familiar with this kind of searching, and only did a little searching; other editors could add more pretty easily, i expect. --do ncr am 21:02, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:17, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philosophy-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:17, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:17, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep -- no single book clearly goes over the notability/influence bar, but 6 books with approximately 200 library holdings each are sufficient to me to satisfy WP:PROF#C1 with the UK Professorship at Oxford Brookes. -- Michael Scott Cuthbert (talk) 07:06, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Per the library-holdings found by Mscuthbert. --Randykitty (talk) 21:34, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.