Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cook’n With Class

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. I might be overstepping my authority here, but I'm inclined to agree with The Banner: if there's one thing we don't need, it's another stagnant, malformed, spammy article on a marginally notable subject. Given the unanimous agreement that the article needs a complete overhaul, and the lack of any strong objections after three weeks, I'm closing this as delete with no prejudice toward reinstatement if somebody wants to take the time to craft a well-formed page. In that event, I'll happily userfy the deleted content. – Juliancolton | ^Talk 02:51, 26 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Cook’n With Class

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Advertising The Banner talk 20:45, 4 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:38, 5 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:39, 5 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:39, 5 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mz7 (talk) 04:05, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Keep- Company meets notability, better to clean up article than marking for deletion.Ireneshih (talk) 11:24, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:47, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Keep - as per Ireneshih. While the AfD guidelines do show that articles which are advertising should be removed, and this article is clearly written in a promotional tone, there is enough real info to warrant keeping and editing. Definitely needs to be tagged as Advertising if kept. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:16, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Problem is that nobody will do the editing... The Banner talk 20:34, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.