Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cooks the Bakery
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) DavidLeighEllis (talk) 01:37, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
- Cooks the Bakery (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Not notable. Philafrenzy (talk) 01:01, 27 January 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 01:51, 27 January 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 01:51, 27 January 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 01:51, 27 January 2014 (UTC)
- Snow Keep. Notable. Passes WP:CORPDEPTH per:
- Birmingham Mail
- Birmingham Post (Scroll down on page for article)
- British Baker magazine
- Bromsgrove Advertiser
- British Baker magazine
- Coventry Telegraph
- British Baker magazine
- The Grocer
- Express and Star
- Romsey Advertiser
- Birmingham Post
- The Times (subscription required)
- Computer Weekly
- – In the event you haven't already done so, please consider performing source searching suggested at Section D of WP:BEFORE prior to nominating articles for deletion. Thank you for your consideration. Northamerica1000(talk) 20:58, 28 January 2014 (UTC)
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 01:09, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
- Keep per Northamerica1000. A major UK chain with 100+ outlets at one time and plenty of sources. Passes WP:GNG and WP:CORPDEPTH., --Arxiloxos (talk) 04:43, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.