Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Coravin

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) J 947 ^{^{^{(c · m)}}} 23:07, 30 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Coravin

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Meets criteria for unambiguous promotion.

Keep Strong GNG passage, especially regarding the device the company sells. Some work might be needed to fix the promotional tone, but this article can be saved. South Nashua (talk) 15:34, 24 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Week keep I have cut back a large amount of promotional content from the article, but it still has flaws. I lean towards keep on this one, but if better arguments can be made for deletion, I may change my mind.--SamHolt6 (talk) 22:25, 24 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. CThomas³ (talk) 01:00, 25 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CThomas³ (talk) 01:00, 25 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - the current version of the article doesn't seem overly promotional, and there is adequate RS coverage to establish notability.PohranicniStraze (talk) 21:39, 25 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - There is more work to be done to make it a decent article, but there is enough to meet WP:GNG and WP:ORG. Operator873^CONNECT 23:06, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.