Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cordaid

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. – Joe (talk) 12:32, 5 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Cordaid (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable organisation. Sources comprise a press release and routine business reporting, and a search finds nothing better. Fails WP:GNG / WP:ORGCRIT. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 05:37, 26 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations and Netherlands. DoubleGrazing (talk) 05:37, 26 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. One of the major Dutch charities. After a quick look for sources (aided by LexisNexis), I found the following:

1. Gedreven helpers: a book about the organization and its predecessors written by a Tilburg University professor and published by nl:Verloren Uitgeverij.
2. A merger with another charity received coverage from major national publications: Trouw, NOS, Nederlands Dagblad, Reformatorisch Dagblad. Using LexisNexis to see behind the paywalls shows coverage about Cordaid's activities and history.
3. More than passing coverage in the articles Een opgeschud bed and "Condoom splijt de katholieke missie", Omroep Brabant, 5 October 2000 (not online)
4. Article about jubilee by Reformatorisch Dagblad, also containing background about the charity (also covered by NOS)

Tristan Surtel (talk) 21:11, 26 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep as per arguments presented by User:Tristan Surtel. Cordaid works with Nationale Postcode Loterij since 1996. In 2021 Cordaid merged with ICCO. See also this article [1]. Ruud Buitelaar (talk) 00:01, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Due to the sources mentioned by Tristan Surtel. MrsSnoozyTurtle 08:15, 5 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.