Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cordon D'Or

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 14:07, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Cordon D'Or (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Seems to fail WP:GNG. I can't find evidence that this was awarded for more than a few years, and seems specific to Florida, covered only by recipients themselves and trade publications. Beware false positives (other things have the same name). This seems to be connected to "Gold Ribbon Inc." and at least one Florida culinary trade association. Appears to have been created by one of the award recipients? — Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 19:02, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. — Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 19:02, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. — Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 19:02, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions. — Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 19:02, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment - The official website no longer exists. This most recent archived version does not inspire confidence (not that website aesthetics/maintenance directly connects to any of our policies/guidelines, of course). — Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 19:03, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete one newspaper article covering the award is not enough to show notability. Although it is better than the huge number of cases of award articles we have only sourced to the website for the award organization. Wikipedia has clearly allowed too many under sourced articles and too many articles linked only to the subject's own website.John Pack Lambert (talk) 15:00, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.