Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Core worlds (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ad Orientem (talk) 00:12, 17 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Core worlds

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:OR description of a fictional term that is nonetheless only a WP:DICDEF and not notable enough for a full article. Previous deletion discussion did not mention any sources that demonstrate notability. _{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 22:35, 9 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 00:23, 10 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science fiction-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 00:23, 10 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - not a notable topic, no articles in the major science fiction encyclopedias and histories of the genre. The sole "reference" is a gaming manual from a licensed game company, not even from the originator of the media franchise in question. --Orange Mike | Talk 01:42, 10 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above, it's a term used, not something that's been covered. I'd like to suggest redirecting it, but it's not clear there's anywhere good. Star Wars#Setting is as close as one can get (there's a map), but it seems that any enlightening content there is gone. A simple sentence or two describing the overview of the galaxy would make it worthwhile, but that's a dark path... ~ Amory (u • t • c) 17:05, 15 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- I should add that most of the history seems to be from what is now at Universe of Star Wars; that becoming a redirect is where most of the broken Star Wars core links are from. ~ Amory (u • t • c) 17:09, 15 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.