Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Coreo (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jujutacular (talk) 17:53, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Coreo

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

non notable and promotional. The references are PR, an the article is written as PR DGG ( talk ) 19:50, 6 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 20:25, 6 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Middle East-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 20:25, 6 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bahrain-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 20:25, 6 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete -- insufficient sources to meet GNG and CORPDEPTH. K.e.coffman (talk) 06:43, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as entirely PR and I would've explored PROD if not for the other one. SwisterTwister talk 22:45, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:NOTWEBHOST. Bearian (talk) 23:50, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.