Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Corey Hawtin

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 15:19, 25 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Corey Hawtin

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and WP:PROMO issues too Kieem trra (talk) 16:05, 17 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Kieem trra (talk) 16:05, 17 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 16:58, 17 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ontario-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 16:58, 17 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This really strikes me as an attack page, so I have CSD'd it. The unsuppressed version is here. --- Possibly (talk)

Well, that did not work, so let's go delete on this. There is significant recent coverage of the June 2021 billion dollar plan, but very little before that. GNG fail.--- Possibly (talk) 18:42, 17 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I agree that this is a likely WP:ATTACKPAGE. It also clearly fails WP:GNG. KidAd • SPEAK 23:22, 17 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per KidAd. 2001:569:74D2:A800:2C55:7654:420F:BE93 (talk) 00:00, 18 June 2021 (UTC) — 2001:569:74D2:A800:2C55:7654:420F:BE93 (talk) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]
Delete. Whether attack or promo, article does not match quality standards. JBchrch talk 13:39, 19 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete The article is not notable enough to be kept. Irrelevant information is present.Aloolkaparatha (talk) 07:32, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. The article's subject, Corey Hawtin, appears to have received significant coverage from multiple reliable sources over an extended period of time relating to his role as the founder of Core Development Group. These include The Toronto Star, Barrie Today, The Globe and Mail, Urban Toronto, etc. If we're worried about biological details aside from public coverage, a wedding page and this bio of his would be a place to start for uncontroversial facts about his personal life/education. At this point, the remnants of the original page have been deleted and the violating edits appear to have been revdel'd/suppressed. As a result, I think that the page itself cannot possibly reasonably be seen to constitute an attack page at this point and the individual passes WP:GNG and WP:BASIC. — Mikehawk10 (talk) 22:22, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A week is not anextended period of time. The first three (the Star, Barrie Today and the Globe) are all from within one week in June 2021. Same story. The fourth is some kind of review on a webinar, from the previous year, which doesn't seem very journalistic. The two bio sources are self-published, but could be OK if RS existed to prove notability. --- Possibly ☎ 20:26, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per Possibly's clear analysis of how this article at best does not pass the BLP 1 event exception to notability.John Pack Lambert (talk) 19:39, 23 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.