Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cork on Sunday

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:51, 3 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Cork on Sunday (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unsourced, and tagged for notability, since creation in December 2010. The title is a real bad search term but I have not found any in-depth coverage in RS. Short lived newspaper that has not attained any notability. Fails WP:Notability (periodicals). Delete. Just Chilling (talk) 18:57, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. – The Grid (talk) 19:34, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. – The Grid (talk) 19:34, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ireland-related deletion discussions. – The Grid (talk) 19:34, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Per nom. Fails WP:GNG, WP:ORG, and other guidelines. In terms of the company, "Cork On Sunday Ltd" was wound-up some time ago, only seems to have existed as a going-concern for a short time, and would appear to fall some way short of the criteria for companies. In terms of the newspaper that the company produced, while we don't have specific guidelines for newspapers, the GNG would seem to expect that the subject would have left at least some verifiable or notable legacy or trail. And, as with the nominator, I'm not able to find any. Hence not meeting WP:LASTING. This article seems to be of limited value anyway. So would support a delete. Guliolopez (talk) 20:20, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. Spleodrach (talk)
• Delete - Search yields no results which can be called WP:RS QueerEcofeminist ^{"cite! even if you fight"!!!} [they/them/their] 04:24, 2 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, No sources, fails WP:GNG Alex-h (talk) 18:58, 2 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.