Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cory Urquhart

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ad Orientem (talk) 04:32, 11 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Cory Urquhart

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject fails WP:NHOCKEY. Has a combined total in 143 games in the AHL and DEL and at least 200 is required to pass criteria #2. No preeminent honours to pass #3 as well. Tay87 (talk) 16:44, 3 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Tay87 (talk) 16:44, 3 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ice hockey-related deletion discussions. Tay87 (talk) 16:44, 3 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Tay87 (talk) 16:44, 3 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Nova Scotia-related deletion discussions. Tay87 (talk) 16:44, 3 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. WP:NHOCKEY does not confer an automatic notability freebie on every hockey player who exists. In the NHL, a hockey player gets to keep an article as soon as he's made ice in at least one NHL-level game; in the leagues where this player actually played, however, the notability test requires playing in at least 200 games and/or winning preeminent honours like a league award. But Cory Urquhart can claim neither, and this article cites no evidence that he's received enough reliable source coverage to get over GNG in lieu of having to satisfy an SNG. Bearcat (talk) 13:12, 4 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Looks like this fails the GNG as it is bound to be no more than a sentence or two transcribed from a statistical source. There has to be enough to produce a readable narrative. No Great Shaker (talk) 23:12, 6 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Doesn't appear to meet any of the notability criteria of WP:NHOCKEY and the only sources are statistical summaries, which don't meet WP:GNG. Papaursa (talk) 20:26, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.