Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Count Iblis

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to List of Battlestar Galactica characters. Tone 15:24, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Count Iblis (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No indication this fictional character passes WP:NFICTION or WP:GNG. Contains in-universe biography (that probably can be referenced with WP:PRIMARY). No indication of real world significance, no section on reception, reviews, scholarly studies, etc. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 10:05, 18 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 10:05, 18 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep/merge Seems to have been a significant character – see An Analytical Guide ..., for example. We should hear from user:Count Iblis, who may know more. Andrew D. (talk) 10:22, 18 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect/merge with List of Battlestar Galactica characters as not independently notable per nom._{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 14:21, 18 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science fiction-related deletion discussions. ミラP 01:31, 19 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. ミラP 01:31, 19 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. ミラP 01:31, 19 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Redirect/merge to List of Battlestar Galactica characters. Insufficient real-world interest to satisfy the GNG. While the Iaccino book's coverage is non-trivial, that itself is largely plot summary. Not enough by itself. • Gene93k (talk) 02:31, 19 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment Count Iblis' real world significance is similar to that of Donald Trump. Count Iblis (talk) 17:37, 21 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Twitter is not a metric of real world significance in the slightest. One can purchase as many Twitter followers as they have the money to afford. I am also pretty sure fictional characters cannot run Twitter accounts._{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 19:38, 21 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.