Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Counter-Strike coaching bug scandal

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Per WP:SKCRIT reason #1. No rationale advanced and no one else recommends deletion. (non-admin closure) _{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 22:43, 10 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Counter-Strike coaching bug scandal (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

عائشة المقدسي (talk) 14:55, 9 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Okay... Why? ~Styyx^{Talk? ^-^} 14:56, 9 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 15:08, 9 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Speedy keep - nominator has failed to provide a reason as to why the article should be deleted Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 17:38, 9 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Note - Non-existent rationale aside, there's some truly awful writing and sourcing going on in the article. Probably not in the projects best interest to simply close this out and forget about it just because they didn't write up a nom. Sergecross73 msg me 17:48, 9 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep - Not all the sources are great, but there are sources from ESPN and the BBC that discuss this specific incident. ApLundell (talk) 19:34, 9 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep: Per ApLundell, sources in the article provide for notability as the event has been covered by multiple reliable sources. ColinBear (talk - contributions) 20:47, 9 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Where is the rationale?! The topic is notable. For example, See these PC Gamer articles[1][2][3]. However the article needs improvement. Mann Mann (talk) 04:26, 10 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment While this is definitely a documentable event from RSes for the VG project, given that no one involved is a notable individual, I don't know if we need to list the names here, and without that table this seems like something that can be merged into a more comprehensive article. --Masem (t) 04:57, 10 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.