Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CoyIM

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 01:19, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

CoyIM

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Found only one RS source. Greek Legend (talk) 08:44, 26 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 09:22, 26 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as non-notable software. SST flyer 02:37, 31 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:59, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep as notable in forcing end-to-end encryption for Jabber/XMMP. --95.91.4.202 (talk) 15:25, 3 April 2016 (UTC

Delete - Software article of unclear notability, lacking multiple independent references. Only RS ref is motherboard.vice.com, which is brief coverage at only a paragraph. This article includes the quote "CoyIM has not received a security audit, and… it is very much an embryonic project. 'It is not ready for regular users,' Soghoian said." suggesting that this is Wikipedia:Too soon. One RS source is not sufficient to establish notability, and a search turned up no additional significant WP:RS coverage.Dialectric (talk) 16:47, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - With Whatsapp offering end-to-end encryption nobody needs decentralized services whose metadata can also be hidden. --95.91.4.202 (talk) 17:50, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as searches found nothing better and the current article is not currently convincing. SwisterTwister talk 05:02, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.