Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CrackVerbal

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Joyous! | Talk 03:37, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

CrackVerbal

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete. Company not-notable, fails ORG. Article is purely promotional. Arun Kumar SINGH (Talk) 05:58, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. GSS (talk) 07:54, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. GSS (talk) 07:54, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: non-notable company. KGirlTrucker81^{huh? what I'm been doing} 12:50, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Fails WP:GNG. All coverage of this institution comes from articles written by its founder Arun Jagannathan. Anup [Talk] 23:41, 20 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as clearly damned as an advertisement, not only because such "coverage" is ever actually paid for by the company itself in exchange for clear advertising in itself, thus there's nothing to suggest actual ingenuity let alone substance. SwisterTwister talk 01:10, 25 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.