Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Craig Minervini (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Consensus is sourcing is insufficient Star Mississippi 21:30, 13 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Craig Minervini (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable sportscaster. Article tagged for notability since 2017 and reads like a resume while fueled by primary sources that are either generic announcements or local/niche coverage. sixtynine ^{• whaddya want? •} 22:28, 15 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Journalism, and Florida. Shellwood (talk) 22:46, 15 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per WP:BLP. The only significant coverage is for his divorce, rather than his professional deeds, which have skimpy coverage. Ping me if I'm missing something. Bearian (talk) 14:37, 22 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:38, 22 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep Along with these promising sources in the article [1] [2], I also found two books with sections about him [3], [4]. These are not 'Three Blind Mice' passing mentions. In my opinion that’s enough coverage to satisfy WP:GNG. Sure, the article could use a bit of improvement, but it’s not unsalvageable. ◇HelenDegenerate◆ 02:37, 24 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Links are either primary sources by the WWE, his former place of employment, or generic local announcements. sixtynine ^{• whaddya want? •} 07:19, 24 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:57, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:40, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Out of the 11 sources cited, only 3, 4, 5 and 6 constituted significant coverage. Source 2 and 11 had nothing about the subject. Rest of the cited sources only mentioned the subject in passing. Tutwakhamoe (talk) 23:24, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.