Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Crede Bailey (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Daniel (talk) 14:26, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Crede Bailey

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

October 2020 AfD closed as no consensus, so I am re-nominating the page after over three months. As I pointed out in my first nomination, the position of "White House Chief Security Officer" certainly fails to meet WP:NPOL. Additionally, the subject of the page still fails WP:SIGCOV, which mandates that sources must

address the topic directly and in detail and includemore than a trivial mention. KidAd talk 01:54, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 07:10, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of COVID-19-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 07:11, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 07:11, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete not every one who is employed at the White House and supervises at least 2 other people is notable. That is pretty much where we would have to draw the line of notability to show that Bailey is notable.John Pack Lambert (talk) 18:01, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 16:26, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to White House COVID-19 outbreak, which appears to be his locus of notability. The consequent amputation of his leg can be noted in the severity parameter there. BD2412 T 19:41, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect as above. Not much else happened for him to be notable. Oaktree b (talk) 19:51, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: No significant coverage that I could find -- which says a lot, given the large, disproportionate amounts of media attention paid to other people in the Trump administration. I'm not sure a redirect is needed, either, given how many people in the White House got COVID. Gnomingstuff (talk) 21:04, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per my comments at the original AfD. Nothing has changed. I do not support a redirect. SportingFlyer T·C 13:01, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.