Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Creditkart Fincom

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 18:02, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Creditkart Fincom (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

PROD contested by IP address. No reason given. Initial concern was This is falling significantly short on WP:NCORP; the company's own press releases do not establish notability, especially when they are simply just rehashings of each other and posted in identical form across various websites of dubious reliability.

Also worth noting that a WP:BEFORE search comes up with nothing better. The coverage does not pass the process outlined at WP:SIRS. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 17:13, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 17:13, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 17:13, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 17:13, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete The "sources" used seem to be only passing mentions or sales listings of products. Oaktree b (talk) 19:40, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete All the sources provided are trivial coverage of either the website opening, or their "100% cashback" promotion. WP:NCORP does not seem to be satisfied. Jumpytoo Talk 20:11, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Per all above. No need to write it all out again. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 13:32, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment Draft:Creditkart Fincom exists. Rotideypoc41352 (talk · contribs) 04:50, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Note: I've histmerged the historical revisions of that draft into the history of this article [1]. Mz7 (talk) 04:07, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. The sourcing is only better than the draft's in that it isn't citing the same press releases ad nauseam. I looked over the draft last night in -en-help and did BEFORE on it (string: "creditkart fincom") and found jack, less than 24 hours later Google still returns nothing useful for notability. —A little blue Bori v^_^v ^{Takes a strong man to deny...} 06:21, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - sources provided do not meet the standard of 'significant coverage' even when they are in reputable publications. Fails WP:NCORP. ƒirefly ( t · c ) 09:09, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - paid-for spam. Cabayi (talk) 07:00, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete I am unable to locate any deep or significant coverage with in-depth information on the company and containing independent content, references to date fail the criteria for establishing notability, topic therefore fails WP:NCORP. HighKing⁺⁺ 22:18, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: A WP:SPA article describing a start-up company's proposition. Indian media searches locate recent start-up coverage (e.g. [2]) and early incentive PR [3] but nothing to demonstrate attained notability. AllyD (talk) 08:30, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.