Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Crowley Baldwin

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Hilltoptc (talk · contribs) blocked indef per WP:NOTHERE. Sandstein 08:33, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Crowley Baldwin

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable. Fails WP:BIO and WP:NACTOR. Single ref points to listal where Schneider has written his own biography. Film career is negligible, and perhaps a case of WP:TOOSOON. scope_creep (talk) 11:24, 18 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

scope_creep (talk) 11:25, 18 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. ―Abelmoschus Esculentus 12:17, 18 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. ―Abelmoschus Esculentus 12:17, 18 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Photography-related deletion discussions. ―Abelmoschus Esculentus 12:17, 18 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. ―Abelmoschus Esculentus 12:17, 18 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Definitely fails the WP:GNG and WP:NACTOR. WP:TOOSOON applies. -- LACaliNYC ✉ 18:55, 18 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete a non-notable actor.John Pack Lambert (talk) 00:06, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note to closing admin The editor who created the article has moved the page to Brownley Watson. There is redirects at Crow Dunne and Crow Washington. scope_creep (talk) 21:04, 21 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note to closing admin The editor who created the article has moved the page again, and renamed the article. The article is now at Roshon Freeman. I think it is clear now that the editor User:Hilltoptc is not here in the best interests of Wikipedia. Even the terrible listal reference page has been updated to make the new name. scope_creep (talk) 07:45, 22 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
We're told that In the span of one year he got to visit all the major events, meet many insane photographers, and on top of that made a lot of new friends. I hope that the friends and insane photographers have been able to keep up with the rapid changes to his name. (See also "Claudio Charles Schneider".) No sign of notability, whatever he's called. Delete. -- Hoary (talk) 04:36, 24 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: More silliness. Neither the Twitter nor the Instagram page linked at the foot of the article exists. The infobox of this multiply named person has been at one time or another linked to "claudiocharlesschneider.com", "crowleybaldwin.com", "crowwashington.com", "roshonfreeman.com". None of these exists. The author of this article appears to be a fantasist. -- Hoary (talk) 08:11, 24 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Another comment: This fellow's main claim to fame is, we're told, that "He played young Rafael Trujillo in the drama film based on the true story of the Dominican Republic's historic Mirabal sisters Tropico de Sangre." Here is the uninteresting website (single web page) for Trópico de Sangre ("coming soon" -- but I'm not sure that it ever came): No mention of any of this person's names. And no mention here, either. A minor part, or just another fantasy? -- Hoary (talk) 08:26, 24 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Comment That is the article name changed again to Claudio Lee Smith. scope_creep (talk) 20:30, 24 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. I don't like to spoil Hilltoptc's fun; however, considering that his whimsical name changes are wasting resources and other people's time (see this in particular), I've protected this article from further page moves. -- Hoary (talk) 23:15, 24 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Hoary, I never realised your were an admin. I contacted an admin early today, on the fourth move. I thought that was the limit. I find the whole episode quite odd. I'm trying to find a metaphor but cant lay my hands on one. scope_creep (talk) 02:14, 25 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

For my part I apologize for the time it took for me to think of preventing page moves. ¶ So what's going on? Trolling, I presume. (Yawn.) -- Hoary (talk) 08:45, 25 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete this trolling fantasy per all of the above and keep Hilltoptc from being able to perpetrate such in the future. — Jeff G. ツ 11:18, 25 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.