Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Culebra (automobile)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Xymmax ^{So let it be written} _{So let it be done} 20:47, 21 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Culebra (automobile)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I recently put this article up for PROD because I don’t think it passes general notability requirements. It is supported by a single source and I have not been able to find any others. The factual accuracy of the article has been disputed in the talk page since 2007 but in the absence of traceable sources I don’t imagine that issue can be resolved. Mccapra (talk) 13:31, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 14:04, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 14:04, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

delete Probably one of the many UK kit cars around at that time. Which isn't enough to make it notable, unless people were talking about it. Andy Dingley (talk) 14:26, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: I was just about to nominate this. Doesn't seem to pass WP:NPRODUCT after quite a few searches. SITH (talk) 15:37, 16 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.