Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cult Classics Seeds

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kurykh (talk) 21:41, 16 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Cult Classics Seeds

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No coverage at all that I can find, except this one competition where the others were disqualified for using pesticides, which is actually kindof an argument against the subject, since it's kindof like being the winner of a race where everybody else was disqualified for using steroids. TimothyJosephWood 21:10, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. NewYorkActuary (talk) 01:28, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete -- WP:TOOSOON; no significance or notability established. Close to A7 material. K.e.coffman (talk) 05:39, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.