Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Current, powered by GE

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. joe decker ^talk 17:47, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Current, powered by GE

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The most that can be demonstrated in this promotional article by a single purpose account is that the President of the company hopes it will become notable by 2020 DGG ( talk ) 04:41, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - non-notable business that fails WP:GNG. - Yellow Dingo (talk) 07:26, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 13:57, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 13:57, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Massachusetts-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 15:17, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 15:17, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Complete failure of WP:CORP, no evidence that this meets the GNG. The outfit ought to get the $ back from the paid SPA. Ravenswing 22:34, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.