Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cyberdoc
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to EHealth#Cybermedicine. (non-admin closure) — Alpha3031 (t • c) 08:37, 28 August 2018 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Cyberdoc (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Not really notable, and the term has been used in various other ways since 2002 Rathfelder (talk) 20:31, 20 August 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. Daß Wölf 03:27, 21 August 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Daß Wölf 03:28, 21 August 2018 (UTC)
- Redirect to EHealth#Cybermedicine - technology neologism article of unclear notability, and no substantial content. Synonym for Cyber Doctor / Cyber Physician referenced in the suggested redirect target.Dialectric (talk) 14:25, 23 August 2018 (UTC)
- I am not sure whether it is just a website or a term. Redirect seems fine. Satpal Dandiwal (talk) 10:03, 25 August 2018 (UTC)
- Redirect to eHealth seems appropriate. The article appears to be just a definition of a new-ish term that exists. Hameltion (talk, contribs) 02:35, 28 August 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.