Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cyfuture (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ad Orientem (talk) 00:05, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Cyfuture

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Obvious promotional article, with major contributions by editors listed at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Amitabhaitc DGG ( talk ) 19:46, 16 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 00:32, 17 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 00:32, 17 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 00:32, 17 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete the tags from 2016 speak volumes-- press release and advert. The numerous ref's in no way indicate significant, in depth coverage. Does not meet GNG-- a craftily created promo piece.Dlohcierekim (talk) 06:44, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails WP:CORPDEPTH and GNG. I've removed the corporate spam, puffery and unnecessary details from the article. -- HighKing⁺⁺17:43, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Definitely, It is the promotion of a company.Wikibaji (talk) 05:31, 21 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete As per above. Light2021 (talk) 20:56, 21 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.