Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cyndago

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ansh666 19:23, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Cyndago (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete per WP:NWEB. Although the story is a tragic one, I do not see significant coverage of the subject in reliable secondary sources. Comatmebro (talk) 22:09, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

As writer of this article, I am willing to hear out any suggestions as to what needs to be sourced. And possibly a list of reliable sources where I can find stuff on Cyndago.-K-popguardian (talk) 22:13, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of South Carolina-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 00:06, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 00:07, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

So what is needed to keep cyndago alive?-76.174.35.70 (talk) 14:26, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:36, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:36, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment: K-popguardian, 76.174.35.70 – what you would need is reliable sources not from YouTube or other social media, or the group's own website/social media platforms, but coverage in independent sources, such as newspapers and music magazines (either in print or online)... not blogs. Richard3120 (talk) 16:04, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Well then, I can assure you I will be looking for Cyndago sources-K-popguardian (talk) 16:28, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Are there like, any youtube news websites?-76.174.35.70 (talk) 14:25, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Sources such as this mention the group in the context of the death of one of its members, but I didn't find significant coverage about the group. Delete per WP:INHERITWEB which states "Web content is not notable merely because a notable person, business, or event was associated with it." --Pontificalibus (talk) 18:33, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: sadly it seems that once you strip out the social media and YouTube sources, the only reliable sources available are those regarding Daniel Kyre's death, rather than anything to do with Cyndago's output before that, which makes them a bit WP:ONEEVENT. The fact that the article's two most enthusiastic "keep" voters seem to have been unable to come up with anything better either in the last two weeks doesn't bode well. Richard3120 (talk) 18:13, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.