Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cyprus Reporter

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Uncontested. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 02:08, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Cyprus Reporter

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

It claims to be the largest print run English newspaper in Cyprus, though unsourced. And I can't find much references. It is an English newspaper. I found only one RS source. Greek Legend (talk) 08:43, 21 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:22, 21 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Cyprus-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:22, 21 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 15:29, 21 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A relatively recent start up (2013), the paper's own website http://cyprusreporter.com/about-us doesn't seem to make any claims as to why it would meet any criterion of Wikipedia:Notability_(media)#Newspapers.2C_magazines_and_journals -- at least not yet. The news link above reveals that it has been cited twice, by the Cyprus Mail and by the BBC, but criterion #4 requires that it be "frequently cited by other reliable sources" (italics added), which does not yet seem to be the case. Regretfully, delete, from what I can see. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 21:13, 21 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I also see this paper didn't merit a mention in Cyprus Mail as a notable competitor, fwiw. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 22:45, 21 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete and restart when there's better information and sources available. SwisterTwister talk 04:46, 27 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.