Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DAGames (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Killiondude (talk) 23:43, 18 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

DAGames

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This was soft deleted previously but I can find no evidence this meets inclusion criteria as there is no coverage in RS to be found. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 22:23, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Gabe Iglesia (talk) 23:50, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Gabe Iglesia (talk) 23:50, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Weak delete as it does not seem to meet WP:WEB and certainly not WP:INHERITWEB. The content itself has not been "the subject of multiple, non-trivial, published works whose source is independent of the site itself" while the website and/or its content have not "won any well-known and independent award from either a publication or organization." -The Gnome (talk) 11:59, 12 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep. He has over a million subscribers which is a lot, but the article is terribly referenced. Szzuk (talk) 13:29, 12 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

1 million subscribers is pretty meaningless and isn't even noteworthy let alone notable...CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 17:00, 16 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete He may have 1 millions subscribers, but that alone is not enough to substantiate WP:NOT. There is no RS to establish WP:Not, and article does not meet WP:WEB, as far as I can ascertain. Deathlibrarian (talk) 03:53, 13 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep There are reliable sources on and about DAGames. You just need to dig deeper. Dannyyankee12 (talk) 22:47, 13 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

WP:THEREMUSTBESOURCES. If there are reliable sources that have significant independent coverage of DAGames, WP:PROVEIT. --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 22:08, 15 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete All coverage I could find was passing mentions and non-independent sources. Doesn't meet WP:WEB or WP:MUSICBIO. --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 22:08, 15 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 22:14, 15 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 22:14, 15 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Per nom and Ahecht. In so far they relate to video game, WP:VG/RS custom search doesn't find any meaningful hits covering the channel indepth either. -- ferret (talk) 22:32, 15 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - I had a look with Goodsearch and couldn't find any good independent sources. The article's trumpeting of such little league claims to fame as appearing in a convention panel also makes me doubtful of the subject's notability.--Martin IIIa (talk) 16:59, 16 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.