Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DBL Partners

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 02:58, 22 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

DBL Partners

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A directory-like page on an unremarkable venture capital fund. Significant RS coverage not found. What comes up is passing mentions, routine notices, and / or WP:SPIP. Does not meet WP:NCORP / WP:CORPDEPTH. Created by Special:Contributions/Mokwepa with few other contributions outside this topic. K.e.coffman (talk) 16:31, 14 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete No evidence of notability in the article and nothing found in a Google search. Alansohn (talk) 14:31, 15 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 15:02, 18 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 15:02, 18 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Finance-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 15:02, 18 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails GNG ^Thanks,L3X1 ◊distænt write◊ 00:52, 19 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, nothing remarkable or notable. Reads like a PR bio. Kierzek (talk) 19:01, 20 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.