Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DJ Kaywise

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 05:56, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

DJ Kaywise

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet notability criteria. I strongly suspect the article creator, User:Jamzy4, has undeclared conflict of interest as he/she has primarily contributed highly promotional articles about Nigerian musical artists, including this article as well as:

Korrekt (musician) (already deleted)
Dremo (deletion nomination)
Black Magic (musician) (deletion nomination)

The fact that all these articles have professional-grade photos with a claim to self-authorship is also very strong evidence of undeclared COI. Citobun (talk) 14:24, 6 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 21:26, 6 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Nigeria-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 21:26, 6 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete all well spotted Citobun. Nominated articles are non-notable with unencyclopedic, conflict of interest and promotional contents all over them. @Jamzy4:, judging by your recently created articles, you need to understand that Wikipedia is not for advertisment. —Oluwa2Chainz »» (talk to me) 21:53, 6 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Comment editors should also be aware that the article creator has been temporarily blocked for a campaign of revenge Afds against the nominator, something that could conceivably be directed at other participants at this Afd, once the 7-day ban expires. As stated at the ANI, he has "nominated at least one article for deletion because it's author !voted delete on an AFD"! Participants should be aware of this. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 11:30, 8 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete all blatantly promotional, non-notable, poor excuses for articles. ThePlatypusofDoom (talk) 17:30, 8 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete all as they are advertorial, trivial and contain nothing for the substance we would need for a fully confirmed and believable article. SwisterTwister talk 06:47, 9 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.