Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DNALinux (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. – Joe (talk) 07:17, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DNALinux (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article fails WP:GNG and lacks third-party reliable sources. Mentions by third-parties online are trivial. Aoidh (talk) 09:23, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Aoidh (talk) 09:23, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom - no independent sources in the article, and no substantial coverage found. User:力 (power~enwiki, π, ν) 01:09, 25 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment: I was about to say "redirect", but there seem to be quite a few book sources for this. jp×g 22:37, 25 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.