Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DWDRAFT
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. – Juliancolton | Talk 04:35, 14 November 2015 (UTC)
DWDRAFT
- DWDRAFT (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable product from non-notable company. Does not meet WP:GNG. WP:NOTDIR ubiquity (talk) 21:00, 28 October 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. —UY Scuti Talk 19:27, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. —UY Scuti Talk 19:27, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —UY Scuti Talk 19:27, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —UY Scuti Talk 19:27, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
- Delete: An article on a software product, by a WP:SPA account whose contributions have been to write the article and remove the Prod notice. There is no claim to attained notability in the article, nor are searches turning up anything which would serve. Fails WP:NSOFT, WP:GNG. AllyD (talk) 07:58, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
- Delete as there's simply not much and anything to suggest better here, WP:TNT at best. SwisterTwister talk 08:38, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
- Delete - as per nom and above editors. Nothing in searches shows it meets notability criteria. Onel5969 TT me 13:53, 12 November 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:19, 12 November 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.