Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DWIM-AM

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect‎ to Aliw Broadcasting Corporation#Inactive. — Red-tailed hawk _(nest) 04:51, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DWIM-AM (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No significant coverage in RS. Could be redirected to Aliw Broadcasting Corporation. MarioGom (talk) 20:09, 7 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Radio and Philippines. MarioGom (talk) 20:09, 7 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep: The first source states that the station broadcasts from Oriental Mindoro. The rest of the sources talk about the station's programming and updates. That said, the article is good enough to pass WP:GNG. ASTIG😎🙃 10:48, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Mere primary source records are not counted towards notability. MarioGom (talk) 10:04, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• What sources exactly do you see with SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth? Just to be clear what you think is SIGCOV.

• Keep Meets WP:GNG per Astig's argument. Sources mentioned are reliable enough and secondary, with the ones mentioned by Astig in-depth IMV. SBKSPP (talk) 23:58, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• What sources exactly do you see with SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth? Just to be clear what you think is SIGCOV.

• All except source 1 are reliable and in-depth enough IMV since they're about the station's programming. SBKSPP (talk) 01:08, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: Fails GNG and NORG/CORP. Found nothing that meets WP:IS WP:RS with WP:SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth. No objection if a consensus redirect emerges, but I can't find one I think is useful.

 // Timothy :: talk  14:03, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:02, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Same reason as Timothy. Most of the references in the article have nothing to do with the subject. Israel's Son 02:05, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• REDIRECT INSTEAD. Redirect to Aliw Broadcasting Corporation is perfect instead of deleting. 49.145.111.255 (talk) 14:31, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:30, 21 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per TimothyBlue. Israel's Son 16:13, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Israel's Son, you can't have two bolded !votes. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 17:37, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Additional analysis of the available reference material about this subject would be helpful.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me} 01:09, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete I agree with the source analysis above. This is a company therefore GNG/WP:NCORP requires at least two deep or significant sources with each source containing "Independent Content" showing in-depth information *on the company*. "Independent content", in order to count towards establishing notability, must include original and independent opinion, analysis, investigation, and fact checking that are clearly attributable to a source unaffiliated to the subject. I'm unable to identify any references that meet the criteria for establishing notability. HighKing⁺⁺ 11:17, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect instead to Aliw Broadcasting Corporation#Inactive per arguments of TimothyBlue and HighKing and possibly add a blurb in that section explaining why that station is no longer active per reliable sources. -Ian Lopez @ 16:40, 31 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.