Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DWWQ

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedily deleted by User:Callanecc per CSD G5. (non-admin closure) • Gene93k (talk) 00:49, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

DWWQ

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable radio station. I can't find any reliable sources. THe article is written like a promotion. Vanjagenije (talk) 09:20, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:49, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:50, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Campus Radio's article - It has no real notability (barely any coverage at all), but at least it exists: a redirect to its parent article wouldn't hurt. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 14:00, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Bushranger _{One ping only} 12:07, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

delete no third party sources and most of the article is a program guide. LibStar (talk) 13:05, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.