Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DWYC
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Sarahj2107 (talk) 11:02, 6 July 2016 (UTC)
- DWYC (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Speedy if G3 applies. Unsourced, and maybe not a WP:HOAX, but this is also not a Radyo5 station in List of TV5 Network, Inc. TV and radio stations (which it should be), and I understand there is a particular issue on WP with Filipino hoax stations. MSJapan (talk) 20:41, 19 June 2016 (UTC)
- It's not a blatent hoax as required by WP:G3. If it's a hoax it is either run-of-the-mill or elaborate. ~Kvng (talk) 16:28, 21 June 2016 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, J04n(talk page) 13:38, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, J04n(talk page) 13:38, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. Mar11 (talk) 16:51, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. Mar11 (talk) 16:51, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. Mar11 (talk) 16:51, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
- Delete as no reliable sources can be found to establish its notability. Not a blatant hoax anyway. Sixth of March 14:41, 30 June 2016 (UTC)
- Delete – Fails WP:N. It appears that it possibly exists, and it is listed in various directories available in web searches, but finding no coverage in reliable sources. North America1000 03:41, 5 July 2016 (UTC)
- Delete as I concur with the nominator, nothing at all minimally convincing and there's certainly nothing to suggest better from this. SwisterTwister talk 06:53, 6 July 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.