Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DWYC

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sarahj2107 (talk) 11:02, 6 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

DWYC (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Speedy if G3 applies. Unsourced, and maybe not a WP:HOAX, but this is also not a Radyo5 station in List of TV5 Network, Inc. TV and radio stations (which it should be), and I understand there is a particular issue on WP with Filipino hoax stations. MSJapan (talk) 20:41, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It's not a blatent hoax as required by WP:G3. If it's a hoax it is either run-of-the-mill or elaborate. ~Kvng (talk) 16:28, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, J04n(talk page) 13:38, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. Mar11 (talk) 16:51, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. Mar11 (talk) 16:51, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. Mar11 (talk) 16:51, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Uses material from the Wikipedia article Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DWYC, released under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license.