Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DYDD

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect‎ to Bantay Radyo. (non-admin closure) asilvering (talk) 01:28, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DYDD

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No significant coverage in RS. Can be redirected to Bantay Radyo. MarioGom (talk) 19:39, 7 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Radio and Philippines. MarioGom (talk) 19:39, 7 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: All the sources in the article are reliable. The first two source states that the station is licensed. The rest of the sources (including source 4) talk about the station's programming and updates. That said, though the station is off the air since 2015, the article is good enough to pass WP:GNG. ASTIG 😎🙃 13:39, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The initial sources are mere primary source records. They do not prove notability. Source 4 is not about DYDD, but about Bantay Radyo (my proposed redirect target). There is only a passing mention about DYDD, so it does not provide significant coverage. Everything else I said at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DYHH applies here. Unless further reliable sources with significant coverage are brought here, I do not see how this article could pass WP:GNG. MarioGom (talk) 23:00, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Astig, What sources exactly do you see with SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth? Just to be clear what you think is SIGCOV. // Timothy :: talk 17:26, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Meets WP:GNG per Astig's argument. Sources mentioned are reliable enough and secondary, with the ones mentioned by Astig in-depth IMV. SBKSPP (talk) 23:56, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
What sources exactly do you see with SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth? // Timothy :: talk 17:26, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Sources 3 to 7 are realiable and in-depth enough IMV since they're about the station's programming. SBKSPP (talk) 02:00, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:48, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Daniel (talk) 22:21, 21 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The article provides sufficient evidence of notability based on reliable sources, including records confirming the station's licensing and in-depth discussions about its programming and updates. Despite the station being off the air since 2015, the coverage meets the criteria outlined in WP:GNG. While there are differing opinions on the reliability of the sources, the majority of them are secondary and contribute to a comprehensive understanding of DYDD. Therefore, the article should be retained, pending any additional reliable sources that may further support its notability."KarKuZoNga (talk) 05:10, 25 January 2024 (UTC) (Struck !vote by blocked account gaming AFD. MarioGom (talk) 18:19, 27 January 2024 (UTC))[reply]
Redirect to Bantay Radyo Delete per nom. Most of the sources I can find are passing mentions. Israel's Son 15:57, 27 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. All of the cited sources are passing mentions. There's no "significant coverage in multiple reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject" as set out by WP:ORGCRITE. I would happily change my mind if someone finds in-depth Philipino or local coverage, though. Tserton (talk) 14:19, 28 January 2024 (UTC) Update: redirecting to Bantay Radyo, as others have suggested, would be acceptable as well. --Tserton (talk) 18:19, 31 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Fails GNG and NCORP.

Source eval:

Sources are barely passing mentions, nothing that meets WP:SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth. Keep votes above are nonsense. // Timothy :: talk 17:25, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: The subject does not meet Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, with no significant coverage found. PhantomSteve/talk¦contribs\ 08:37, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Bantay Radyo per WP:ATD-R. Those calling for deletion haven't explained why this is an invalid redirect target; an analysis for sources towards notability is irrelevant for redirects, which just need verifiable information in the target article. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 10:57, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Does not meet WP:SIGCOV. SpacedFarmer (talk) 11:18, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I don't mean to single you out specifically, but did you read my above comment? (And also WP:VAGUEWAVE) Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 11:42, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: For further discussion of WP:ATD vs deletion
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, _signed,Rosguill ^talk 14:14, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect as suggested seems like the best option. I'm not seeing sigcov about the station. Oaktree b (talk) 16:33, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Bantay Radyo per Ritchie333 and Oaktree b. -Ian Lopez @ 17:08, 31 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.