Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DYSS-TV (3rd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was procedural keep‎. (non-admin closure) Tavantius (talk) 01:39, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DYSS-TV

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Television station keep meets WP:NTV and WP:GNG, as per WayKurat's argument. This is one of the oldest regional TV stations in the Philippines (outside Metro Manila), and it is one of the major originating TV stations of GMA Network in Cebu City. There is no redirect for this page since DYSS served as a Visayas flagship station of the GMA network which founded in February 1962. Smileyface143 II 23:15, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep? @Smileyface143 II, as the nominator, what is your reason for this being nominated for deletion? Tavantius (talk) 17:29, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions Smileyface143 II, 23:15, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2024 November 2. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 15:29, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 15:37, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: It seems to be the same goes with DZBB-TV. This would be nominated for a keep because DYSS is the Visayas flagship station of GMA Network and it is the oldest TV station outside Metro Manila. One at Heart 2002, 23:45, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions One at Heart 2002, 23:45, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This article direly needs sourcing attention, but I know that many of the needed sources are offline or may not exist because of martial law. This is the type of article—based on the known history—that needs improvement, not trashing. Procedural keep as no deletion rationale was provided. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 21:58, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Procedural keep No rationale for deletion provided. Nate • (chatter) 23:46, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Result: Nomination for this article might be keep for good. This is because no longer rationale for deletion provided.

One at Heart 2002, 01:33, 03 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.