Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daanveer

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Mz7 (talk) 21:27, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Daanveer

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is yet another film article that fails WP:NFILM and WP:GNG.

References: Essentially unsourced. Kolma8 (talk) 19:14, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Kolma8 (talk) 19:14, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 19:43, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - this one at least has an assertion of notability (being successful at the box office) although it's an unsourced assertion currently Spiderone 19:44, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - it could be, but I wasn't able to find any supporting mentioning of the box office success. I found here [1] that "India's Lifetime Gross Collection: ₹4.29 Cr", which is in today's conversion into USD is roughly $500K..."Film did well at Indian box office and also recovered its total budget and made decent amount of profit." But again no on-line references. Kolma8 (talk) 14:01, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Missvain (talk) 16:32, 29 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz ^talk 01:46, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Donaldd23 (talk) 13:36, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.