Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dabble (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) B dash (talk) 06:11, 18 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Dabble

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG. Not an easy search term but I have been unable to find indepth coverage in RS. Note:the previous AFD was on an entirely different product, a video search service. Delete. Just Chilling (talk) 19:01, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 20:24, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Searching only for "dabble" "board game" brought up lots of sale sites and some reviews [1] [2] [3] I'm not arguing all those are RS, but the results pages just go on and on and I think there's likely enough here to get it over WP:GNG, especially since it appears to be a widely distributed game. SportingFlyer T·C 23:33, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 04:25, 3 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Nosebagbear (talk) 19:13, 10 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.