Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daeyang Gallery and House

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Nomination withdrawn StarM 02:05, 23 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Daeyang Gallery and House (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

insignificant coverage and no source improvement has been done since 2012 Editor General of Wiki (talk) 17:39, 19 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Museums and libraries-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:38, 19 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Arts-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:38, 19 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of South Korea-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:38, 19 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 10:00, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep No valid rationale given for deletion, lack of improvement is not a valid reason, and the nominator should perform a check for sources before nominating. The building appears to have received some coverage - [1][2][3][4][5][6], and there are likely more sources in Korean. Should pass WP:GNG. Hzh (talk) 11:07, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. Appears to be an architecturally significant building and has received quite a bit of coverage, e.g. [7] in addition to the links above. Also agree with Hzh that it has likely received coverage in Korean-language media as well. Camerafiend (talk) 12:53, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. Satisfies GNG. James500 (talk) 06:10, 22 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Nominationwithdrawn- Per rationale given by the keep voters. - Editor General of Wiki (talk) 18:59, 22 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.