Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dafuniks

Dafuniks

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The band does not meet criteria set out by WP:BAND and has not been the subject of coverage to meet WP:BASIC. Uffda608 (talk) 12:32, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Denmark, Music, and Bands and musicians. Uffda608 (talk) 12:32, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2025 April 21. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 12:54, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Previous WP:PROD candidate, ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 14:21, 28 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete lacks significant coverage and sources per Google check. WP:N not met. HilssaMansen19 (talk) 12:46, 30 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 14:34, 5 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The article needs some work, but there is ample coverage capable of meeting WP:BAND criterion #1 if you expand your search to French music publications. For example, there is this French article published by Nova. This includes some significant coverage, albeit tangentially to an article about their record label, but tangential coverage can still satisfy WP:SIGCOV. There are also two brief articles about their 2012 album and about a 2023 song, both published by Jazz Radio. Lastly, I also found a 2015 article about them by Radio France. Flip^and Flopped ㋡ 17:51, 5 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]