Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daily Mahasib

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 02:29, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Daily Mahasib

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Local newspaper with no notability found. Fails WP:GNG. Greenbörg (talk) 07:46, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. – Uanfala 08:39, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. – Uanfala 08:39, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Greenbörg, in the space of eight minutes you've nominated for deletion seven articles about Pakistani newspapers, with virtually identical deletion rationales. Can you divulge what checks you've performed to convince youreself that all these articles don't meet GNG? – Uanfala 08:46, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Absolutely. I checked every article then I picked those who fail WP:GNG then I nominated them one by one. I think you thought, I just blindly done that. No worries. Thanks, Greenbörg (talk) 09:11, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  - Thanks! I'll just add that it might be a good idea to share what checks you've performed and where you've looked for sources so that any participants in the discussion don't duplicate the effort. – Uanfala 09:24, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. According to the information in the lede, this newpsaper is published and circulated across three of Pakistan's provinces, so it really isn't a "local newspaper". – Uanfala 09:24, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 07:55, 17 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete a total lack of reliable sources to support notability.John Pack Lambert (talk) 00:00, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.